Brick to Blade: Sustainable Progress, Not Instant Gratification
Related Links

GLAA endorses Domestic Partnerships Joint Filing Act 11/02/06

Bill 16-0958

GLAA urges Danaher Corporation to adopt DP benefits 10/20/06

GLAA writes South African ambassador urging marriage equality 10/16/06

GLAA urges PEPCO to adopt DP benefits 07/17/06

GLAA urges Washington Gas Light to adopt DP benefits 07/17/06

GLAA endorses two domestic partnership bills 06/15/06

GLAA endorses DP health care benefits tax exemption bill 09/28/05

GLAA endorses Domestic Partnership health insurance bills 07/07/05

GLAA Testifies on Domestic Partnership enhancement bill 05/12/05

GLAA update on gay couples, Congress, and the District 05/04/05

Update to GLAA members on marriage fight in D.C. 04/20/05

GLAA Statement on Bill 16-52 01/31/05

GLAA on marriage and families


GLAA is a Lambda Rising Affiliate! Click here and we'll get a commission on every item you purchase.

Brick to Blade: Sustainable Progress, Not Instant Gratification


[Note: the square-bracketed portion of the sixth paragraph below was cut from the letter by the Blade editor.]


The Washington Blade
Letters

November 17, 2006

To the Editors:

The Blade, in reporting on the effect the midterm election results will have on the marriage equality movement in D.C., gives the impression that we will have smooth sailing under a Democratic Congress (“Election results ‘bode well’ for D.C. gays: Fenty,” Nov. 10). In reality, most of us doing the gay rights work here in the District agree with Shadow Senator Paul Strauss that continued caution is called for.

Congressional interference may diminish, but is not likely to end. The new majority is extremely narrow, and the vote totals on marriage will not change much. As Blade Managing Editor Kevin Naff himself wrote in a November 8 blog entry, “Many Democrats coming to Washington ran on conservative platforms and won’t vote in lockstep with the liberal wing of the party.”

The 110th Congress may find us better able to block anti-gay measures, but we still have a long way to go before the District will be safe from congressional meddling. Democratic congresses have shown no greater respect for D.C. Home Rule than Republican ones.

For the same reasons, it is doubtful that Congress will let the District recognize same-sex marriages performed in Massachusetts. As we have been saying consistently for years, our fight for civil marriage equality is a marathon and not a sprint.

With this in mind, we would be ill-advised to act before consulting our allies, chief among them Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton. Let’s get the lay of the land in the new Congress and adjust our strategy accordingly. By the way, the fact that a majority of D.C. Council members supports marriage equality does not mean they agree about timing.

We gain nothing from mere satisfying gestures that will quickly be swatted down. [As Councilmember David Catania wisely told The Advocate last February, “We should be taking important steps forward that are sustainable and that do not generate a response that would eviscerate all our advances.”]

GLAA is always looking for volunteers; our meeting schedule and advocacy materials can be found at www.glaa.org. To help defend Home Rule, contact DC Vote at www.dcvote.org.

Sincerely,

Barrett L. Brick
President
Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, D.C.


pageok