GLAA thanks Washington Gas for domestic partner benefits
Related Links

GLAA endorses Betty Ann Kane for Public Service Commission 02/21/07

GLAA protests rate increases by PEPCO and Washington Gas Light 01/03/07

GLAA urges Danaher Corporation to adopt DP benefits 10/20/06

GLAA urges PEPCO to adopt DP benefits 07/17/06

GLAA urges Washington Gas Light to adopt DP benefits 07/17/06

Turn out the lights on Pepco (Rosenstein, The Washington Blade) 07/07/06

HRC guide to Domestic Partner benefits

GLAA on Domestic Partnership

GLAA on Consumers and Businesses

GLAA is a Lambda Rising Affiliate! Click here and we'll get a commission on every item you purchase.

GLAA thanks Washington Gas for domestic partner benefits

Fighting for Equal Rights Since 1971
P. O. Box 75265
Washington, D.C. 20013
(202) 667-5139

February 27, 2007

Mr. William Zeigler, Jr.
Vice President
Human Resources & Organization Development
Washington Gas
6801 Industrial Road
Springfield, Virginia 22151

Dear Mr. Zeigler:

I am writing to thank you for adopting a new domestic partners benefits policy as of January 1.

As we understand it, this new policy allows an employee in a same-sex relationship living in the District of Columbia who has registered their domestic partnership with the District government to receive the same benefits as your married employees do.

Although we regard this new policy as a good-faith beginning, it is not as good as it might be, and we would like to offer a few suggestions for improvement.

First, we would encourage you to broaden the eligibility requirements so that Washington Gas employees living outside the District of Columbia could qualify if they have registered with the District government as domestic partners. The District law specifically allows any couple to register as domestic partners regardless of where they live. We suspect you might not have been aware of that nuance when you adopted your current policy, so we hope you will take another look at this matter in a new light.

Second, we would urge you to allow employees other than those enrolled in PPO programs to qualify. We do not understand why your current policy is restricted to PPO enrollees, although we suspect that enrollment of HMO employees might not be possible under the HMO contracts you currently are operating under. If this is the case, we hope you will be committed to renegotiate this point with your HMOs as present contracts expire.

Third, we would hope that you could include information about your new domestic partners program on your company’s official web site. Our inability to find anything when we searched for the terms “domestic partner” and “civil union” on your web site was one of the factors that misled us into thinking you had not yet taken any steps to remedy the problem. We also hope you are taking steps to publicize the program to all your job applicants.

Unfortunately, we did not see the letter you wrote us on October 20 until last month, and we did not fully understand it until last week.

Last week GLAA Secretary Craig Howell testified before the D.C. Council Committee on Public Services and Consumer Affairs, chaired by Councilmember Mary Cheh, in support of Betty Ann Kane’s nomination to the D.C. Public Service Commission. At the end of that testimony, Mr. Howell criticized both your company and PEPCO for their lack of domestic partner programs.

Luckily, Mr. Steven Jumper of your company attended that hearing, and spoke with Mr. Howell afterwards. Mr. Jumper contended that Washington Gas’s new program does indeed cover same-sex couples living in the District who are officially registered as domestic partners. Mr. Howell asked Mr. Jumper to provide the necessary documentation to prove this claim, and Mr. Jumper agreed to do so promptly. Mr. Jumper was as good as his word and sent us the information the very next day.

Since then, we at GLAA have taken the following steps.

Copies of all these documents are available on our web site,

We are gratified that Washington Gas has substantially come around on this important application of the principle of equal pay for equal work, and only regret the communications difficulties that kept us from realizing that fact sooner. We regard your adoption of a domestic partners benefits program as a “win-win” for everyone concerned and look forward to its steady improvement.


Barrett L. Brick

Cc: Steven Jumper

Page not found – GLAA

Nothing Found

Sorry, the page you tried to access does not exist or has changed address