ACLU defends privacy in HIV reporting
Related Links

GLAA on AIDS and Public Health

GLAA criticizes proposed HIV reporting regulations 12/20/00

Testimony for FY 2001 Budget Hearings on Department of Health 03/24/00

CDC Guidelines for National HIV Case Surveillance 01/20/00

Mayor Announces Decision to Implement Unique Identifier System 08/20/99

Howell Praises Evans' leadership in Council's response on HIV Names Reporting 08/03/99

Eleven of Thirteen Councilmembers Oppose HIV Names Reporting 07/27/99

Howell protests one-sided HIV surveillance roundtable meeting 07/06/99

Howell urges Allen committee to block names reporting 04/14/99

Department of Health won't budge on names reporting 04/12/99

GLAA testifies on FY 2000 AIDS budget 04/01/99

Open Letter to Public Health Officials Regarding Names-Based HIV Reporting 03/15/99

Howell testifies against mandatory HIV names reporting 02/23/99

GLAA joins AIDS experts opposing mandatory HIV names reporting 02/21/99

ACLU Comments on CDC Draft Guidelines on National HIV Case Surveillance 01/11/99

San Francisco AIDS Foundation Critique of HIV Names Reporting 05/98

ACLU defends privacy in HIV reporting

December 21, 2000

General Counsel
D.C. Department of Health
825 North Capitol Street, NE
Fourth Floor
Washington, DC 20002

Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Amendments to Chapter 2 of 22 DCMR

Dear General Counsel:

The following are our comments on the Proposed Rulemaking to amend Chapter 2 of Title 22 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations.

A "Unique Identifier System" for reporting persons with HIV disease is necessary to ensure that persons who believe they may have been exposed to HIV will not avoid being tested for fear of having their medical records disclosed. Unfortunately, the proposed amendments undermine this objective by requiring that in addition to the use of the unique numeric code, the report must include the person's social security number.

Because of the widespread use of the social security number for other purposes, such as credit reports, it is relatively easy to obtain the name of an individual through the social security number. The preamble to the proposed rulemaking suggests that it is indeed the intent of the Department of Health to learn the names of persons reported to have HIV disease so as to "facilitate early contact of other persons who may have been infected." Whatever may be the public health value of such tracing, we believe that requiring persons to provide their social security numbers in order to be tested will substantially discourage testing and that this will prove more detrimental to public health. The reference to social security number in the proposed amendment of 206.3 should be deleted. In the interest of public health, a legitimate Unique Identifier System should be established, one that does not undermine the privacy of persons with HIV disease.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Mary Jane DeFrank
Executive Director ACLU of the National Capital Area

cc: Members of the Council
Mayor Anthony Williams


pageok